stem/AI/Neural Networks/Properties+Capabilities.md
Andy Pack efa7a84a8b vault backup: 2023-12-27 21:56:22
Affected files:
.obsidian/graph.json
.obsidian/workspace-mobile.json
.obsidian/workspace.json
Languages/Spanish/Spanish.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Classification.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Decision Trees.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Logistic Regression.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Random Forest.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Supervised/SVM.md
STEM/AI/Classification/Supervised/Supervised.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/Activation Functions.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/CNN/CNN.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/CNN/GAN/DC-GAN.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/CNN/GAN/GAN.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/Deep Learning.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/Properties+Capabilities.md
STEM/AI/Neural Networks/SLP/Perceptron Convergence.md
2023-12-27 21:56:22 +00:00

3.2 KiB

tags
ai

Linearity

  • Neurons can be linear or non-linear
  • Network of non-linear neurons is non-linear
  • Non-linearity is distributed
  • Helpful if target signals are generated non-linearly

Input-Output Mapping

  • Map input signal to desired response
  • Similar to non-parametric statistical inference
    • Non-parametric as in no prior assumptions
    • No probabilistic model

Adaptivity

  • Synaptic weights
    • Can be easily retrained
  • Stationary environment
    • Essential statistics can be learned
    • Model can then be frozen
  • Non-stationary environments
    • Can change weights in real-time
    • In general, more adaptive = more robust
      • Not always though
      • Short time-constant system may be thrown by short-time spurious disturbances
      • Stability-plasticity dilemma
    • Not equipped to track statistical variations
    • Adaptive system
  • Linear adaptive filter
    • Linear combiner
      • Single neuron operating in linear mode
    • Mature applications
    • Nonlinear adaptive filters
      • Less mature
  • Environments typically considered pseudo-stationary
    • Speech stationary over short windows
  • Retrain network at regular intervals to account for fluctuations
    • E.g. stock market
  • Train network on short time window
    • Add new data and pop old
      • Slide window
    • Retrain network

Evidential Response

  • Decisions are made with evidence not just declared
    • Confidence value

Contextual Information

  • Knowledge represented by structure and activation weight
    • Any neuron can be affected by global activity
  • Contextual information handled naturally

Fault Tolerance

  • Hardware implementations
  • Performance degrades gracefully with adverse conditions
  • If some of it breaks, it won't cause the whole thing to break
    • Like a real brain

VLSI Implementability

  • Very large-scale integration
    • Chips with millions of transistors (MOS)
    • E.g. microprocessor, memory chips
  • Massively parallel nature
    • Well suited for VLSI

Uniformity in Analysis

  • Are domain agnostic in application
    • Analysis methods are the same
    • Can share theories, learning algorithms

Neurobiological Analogy

  • Design analogous to brain

    • Already a demonstrable fault-tolerant, powerful, fast, parallel processor
  • To slight changes

    • Rotation of target in images
    • Doppler shift in radar
  • Network needs to be invariant to these transformations

Invariance

  1. Invariance by Structure
    • Synaptic connections created so that transformed input produces same output
    • Set same weight for neurons of some geometric relationship to image
      • Same distance from centre e.g.
    • Number of connections becomes prohibitively large
  2. Invariance by Training
    • Train on different views/transformations
      • Take advantage of inherent pattern #classification abilities
    • Training for invariance for one object is not necessarily going to train other classes for invariance
    • Extra load on network to do more training
      • Exacerbated with high dimensionality
  3. Invariant Feature Space
    • Extract invariant features
      • Use network as classifier
    • Relieves burden on network to achieve invariance
      • Complicated decision boundaries
    • Number of features applied to network reduced
    • Invariance ensured
    • Required prior knowledge