adding context and crypto content

content/posts/dnstp/index.md

@@ -1,10 +1,73 @@
 ---
 title: "dnstp: Transmitting Arbitrary Data With DNS"
-date: 2024-07-02T08:26:40+00:00
+date: 2024-10-12T08:26:40+00:00
 ---
 
 ![Build Binaries](https://github.com/Sarsoo/dnstp/actions/workflows/build.yml/badge.svg)
+[![GitHub](https://img.shields.io/badge/github-%23121011.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=github&logoColor=white)](https://github.com/Sarsoo/dnstp)
 
-I have written previously about my Rust projects. However, these have always been in WebAssembly so they are consumed from a web browser. I wanted to play with native Rust code and the multi-threaded ecosystem.
+[![Rust](https://img.shields.io/badge/rust-%23000000.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=rust&logoColor=white)](https://git.sarsoo.xyz/sarsoo/-/packages/cargo/dnstplib)
+[![Docker](https://img.shields.io/badge/docker-%230db7ed.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=docker&logoColor=white)](https://git.sarsoo.xyz/sarsoo/-/packages/container/dnstp)
 
-Something I also enjoy, when working with low-level languages, is bitwise operations. These two led me to the idea of building
+I have written previously about my Rust projects. However, these have always been in WebAssembly so they are consumed from a web browser. I wanted to play with native Rust code and some if its highly regarded multi-threading features.
+
+Something I also enjoy, when working with low-level languages, is bitwise operations. These two led me to the desire to do a native Rust project. I was aware of the concept of [DNS tunneling](https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/network-security-tutorials/what-is-dns-tunneling#what-are-the-dns-tunneling-techniques), I believe I heard the idea described on [Security This Week with Carl Franklin](https://securitythisweek.com/). So that was the inspiration, build some sort of DNS tunneling apparatus, largely to have a toy project that I could fiddle with.
+
+# spec
+
+There were a few things that would need to considered when building something like this
+
+1. How much like normal DNS traffic would this tool appear to be
+2. Is there some sort of DNS library for Rust or would I need to write one
+3. What would this protocol look like on top of DNS
+4. How would the data be secured (given that bog-standard DNS is unencrypted)
+
+# surreptitious
+
+I decided that the traffic should be standard DNS messages, this was so that any DNS proxies in between would be able to understand the messages and forward them on. The idea is that a hypothetical `dnstp` server wouldn't need to be sent to directly, but could be reached regardless of what path the DNS messages would take. 
+
+In the past, I have had NAT rules on my router that redirected all DNS traffic from the LAN to itself so that it could do the requisite adblocking and upstream forwarding. This is handy for IoT devices like Chromecasts. _As an aside, this will likely be less of a solution as DNS-over-HTTP(s) has become a standard_.
+
+Because of this possibility that the DNS messages will not go straight from client to server but could be proxied and processed through routers and DNS servers in between, the messages should conform to DNS standards.
+
+# protocol
+
+## cryptography + handshakes
+
+In order to protect the data, it should be encrypted during transmission. The client and server need to be able to agree on a unique, ephemeral key without transmitting it over the insecure channel. This is done using a [key agreement protocol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key-agreement_protocol), a specialisation of [key exchange protocols](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_exchange). This has the classic advantage of using the more expensive asymmetric cryptography initially to agree on a private but shared symmetric key which is less expensive to use from then on.
+
+For this implementation, the [Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic-curve_Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman) or ECDH algorithm was used, specifically the [p256](https://docs.rs/p256/latest/p256/) crate.
+
+The protocol for performing this key exchange goes a bit like this. The client generates an ECDH asymmetric pair. It formulates a DNS request in the form:
+
+```
+Name Request 1: 
+    Record type = A, 
+    Hostname = static.CONFIGURED_BASENAME (e.g static.sarsoo.xyz)
+Name Request 2: 
+    Record type = A, 
+    Hostname = base_64(CLIENT_PUBLIC_KEY).CONFIGURED_BASENAME
+```
+
+When the server identifies that the message is a client handshake request by the hostname of the first request, it generates its own ECDH key pair. The response it sends back to the client is as such:
+
+```
+Name Response 1: 
+    Record type = A, 
+    IP = 127.0.0.1
+Name Response 2: 
+    Record type = CNAME, 
+    Hostname = base_64(SERVER_PUBLIC_KEY).CONFIGURED_BASENAME
+```
+
+With this response, each side now has the other's public key. With this and their own private key, the shared secret can be divined independently. The server keeps a map of its known clients using their public key as an identifier. It stores it's shared secret alongside this key.
+
+## data transmission
+
+With this security context set, we can now send data over the insecured channel.
+
+# dnstplib
+
+# mvp
+
+# limitations